T.K. Butt v. California

842 P.2d 1240 (1992)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

T.K. Butt v. California

California Supreme Court
842 P.2d 1240 (1992)

JL

Facts

The Richmond Unified School District (the district) (defendant) experienced a period of mounting financial deficits. In late April 1991, the district announced that it planned to end that year’s school term six weeks early. Thomas Butt and other district parents (plaintiffs) filed a class-action lawsuit against the district and the State of California (defendant), alleging that the unexpected early closure violated the students’ right to an effective education and discriminated against students in the district compared to other students in California. Several district teachers submitted declarations that the shortened school year would prevent the completion of instruction and grading essential for academic promotion, high school graduation, and college entrance. The plaintiffs requested an injunction to prohibit the district from ending the school year early. The trial court granted the injunction, and the defendants appealed. The appeal was transferred directly to the California Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Baxter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership