T.S. v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services
Florida District Court of Appeal
654 So. 2d 1028 (1995)

- Written by Katrina Sumner, JD
Facts
As a result of certain incidents, Florida’s Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (the department) prepared a proposed confirmed report for its central child-abuse registry indicating that T.S. (defendant) had inflicted mental abuse on his son, who was 12 years old. The report also alleged other threatened harm or mental-injury abuse. T.S. requested that the report be expunged. Because the department denied the request, T.S. sought a formal hearing. A hearing officer noted that Florida’s statute relating to child abuse did not define mental abuse. Thus, it would be necessary to consider the definitions of the terms “abused or neglected child,” “child abuse or neglect,” “harm,” and “mental injury” in the sequential order in which they appeared in Florida Statute 415.503. The first two terms referenced harm or threatened harm to the physical or mental health of a child by a parent’s acts. Harm occurred if a parent inflicted a physical or mental injury on a child. Mental injury was defined as an injury to a child’s psychological or intellectual capacity, as shown by a recognizable and significant impairment in the child’s ability to operate in the child’s normal range of conduct, with due consideration for the child’s culture. Thus, the hearing officer determined that the department’s report could stand only if there was evidence that T.S. had harmed or threatened harm to his son’s mental health by inflicting a mental injury on him. The hearing officer then assessed that the evidence did not demonstrate that T.S. had inflicted a mental injury on his son and recommended that the department expunge the report. The hearing officer provided a summary of the testimony but did not specifically accept or reject the testimony. The department adopted the hearing officer’s findings of fact and conclusions of law but not the hearing officer’s determination that the evidence did not support the perpetration of a mental injury. The department entered an order denying expungement. T.S. appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Booth, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.