Tackett v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
445 S.W.3d 20 (2014)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
At the trial of General Tackett (defendant), Tackett’s counsel in his opening statement stated that evidence did not exist to corroborate the testimony of Sarah and Nicholas that was to come. On direct examination, Sarah testified that she was a member of Beta Club in her school, which was a program for good students. On direct examination of Nicholas, the prosecution (plaintiff) asked whether he was telling the truth or had any reason to lie. Nicholas testified that he was telling the truth and had no reason to lie. Tackett was convicted, and he appealed, arguing that the prosecution improperly bolstered the testimony of Sarah and Nicholas.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Keller, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.