Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
  • T
  • Taco Bell, Inc. v. LannonTaco Bell, Inc. v. Lannon
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

Taco Bell, Inc. v. Lannon

Colorado Supreme Court
744 P.2d 43 (1987)


Facts

A Taco Bell, Inc. (defendant) restaurant located in a dangerous neighborhood of Denver was robbed 10 times over the course of three years. Just two days after the most recent robbery, John Lannon (plaintiff) entered the restaurant, only to find that he was interrupting an armed robbery. Lannon ran out the door into the parking lot, and one of the robbers shot after him, injuring Lannon’s ring finger. Lannon sued Taco Bell for negligence. Lannon alleged that Taco Bell had acted negligently by failing to take adequate measures to protect customers from the foreseeable criminal acts of third parties. At trial, police officers testified regarding security measures that Taco Bell might have taken to reduce the likelihood of armed robberies, such as hiring security guards. Taco Bell moved for a directed verdict, arguing that it had no duty to protect customers from the criminal acts of third parties. The trial court denied Taco Bell’s motion. The jury found in favor of Lannon, awarding him $40,000 in damages. Taco Bell appealed. The court of appeals held, among other things, that the evidence established a duty for Taco Bell to take reasonable measures to prevent or deter reasonably foreseeable acts, such as armed robberies. Both Taco Bell and Lannon petitioned for certiorari. The supreme court granted certiorari on the issue of whether a fast food restaurant in a high crime area has a legal duty to take measures to protect customers from criminal acts.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lohr, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 449,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 449,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial