United States Supreme Court
278 U.S. 470 (1929)
Elizabeth C. Taft (plaintiff) received 100 shares of stock from her father as a gift in 1921 and 1922. Taft’s father had purchased the shares in 1916 for $1,000. At the time of transfer, the shares of stock had appreciated to $2,000. In 1923, Taft sold the shares for $5,000. The United States calculated a $4,000 increase in income based on the $1,000 appreciation during the father’s ownership and the $3,000 appreciation during Taft’s ownership, and taxed Taft accordingly. Taft paid the tax but subsequently sued for a refund, arguing that only the $3,000 increase during her ownership was income, and that the Sixteenth Amendment prevented Congress from taxing her for any increase during her father’s ownership. The District Court held in Taft’s favor. The Court of Appeals reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (McReynolds, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 239,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.