Tahoe National Bank v. Phillips
California Supreme Court
4 Cal. 3d 11, 480 P.2d 320 (1971)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Beulah F. Phillips and her partners (defendants) urgently needed a loan to continue their work on a real estate development. Tahoe National Bank (plaintiff) agreed to make the loan after Phillips signed a document, prepared and presented to her by the bank, entitled "Assignment of Rents and Agreement Not to Sell or Encumber Real Property." The real property to which this document applied was Phillips's house. Phillips subsequently filed for a homestead exemption on the property, but otherwise she complied with the document's terms. The partners defaulted on the loan and the bank sued. One of the remedies the bank requested was foreclosure on the instrument as an equitable mortgage. At trial, the bank president testified that he viewed the document as the equivalent of a mortgage, and he pointed out that the document stated that it secured a loan. Phillips testified that she would not have signed the document if she thought it amounted to a mortgage, and that she did not think she had the power to mortgage the property because she held the property, in part, only as her deceased husband's trustee. The trial court ruled that the document constituted an equitable mortgage and ordered foreclosure. Phillips appealed to the Supreme Court of California.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tobriner, J.)
Dissent (Sullivan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.