Logourl black

Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

United States Supreme Court
535 U.S. 302 (2002)


Facts

The City of Tahoe created the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (defendant) to develop a comprehensive land-use plan to regulate the economic impact of development on the Tahoe environment. While the plan was being developed, the Agency enacted two moratoria on development so it could study the impact of this activity on the Tahoe Basin. The combined effect of these two moratoria was to prohibit all development on sensitive areas of land on the California side of the Tahoe Basin for thirty-two months, and to prohibit development of sensitive lands on the Nevada side of the Basin for eight months. The Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. (plaintiff) filed suit against the Agency in federal district court on behalf of over 2,400 landowners in the Tahoe Basin and other sensitive areas on the grounds that the moratoria constituted an unconstitutional taking without just compensation of the landowner’s property while they were imposed. The district court held that the moratoria constituted a taking, but the court of appeals reversed on the grounds that because the moratoria had only a temporary impact on the landowners’ economic interest in the properties, no categorical taking occurred. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Thomas, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Rehnquist, C.J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 90,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 12,195 briefs - keyed to 164 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now