Taliaferro v. Taliaferro
Kansas Supreme Court
200 Kan. 573, 921 P.2d 803 (1996)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
While in the hospital, Will Taliaferro executed estate-planning documents including two trusts. One created a trust for Will’s business assets. The second created a revocable inter vivos trust for Will’s personal assets. The personal trust said Will declared the trust established, appointed himself trustee, and accepted and held everything in trust described on an attached schedule, including stock Will owned outside his business, a life-insurance-policy interest, and all his personal property. The trust directed income to Will for life, then directed distribution to Adoria Taliaferro and other named beneficiaries (defendants), with the remainder to Will’s wife, Betty Taliaferro (plaintiff). Will transferred the business stock to the business trust by assigning it to himself as trustee, but he did not assign his personal assets to himself as trustee of the personal trust. About six months later, Will died leaving Betty as his sole heir, executor, and successor trustee. Betty sued to invalidate the personal trust, arguing Will never transferred trust property into it. The trial court found that either Will never accepted and handled the property as trust property or that he effectively transferred it to the trust and later changed his mind, either of which made the trust invalid. The trust beneficiaries appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Larson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.