Tallarico v. Trans World Airlines
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
881 F.2d 566 (1989)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
Polly Tallarico (plaintiff) was 14 years old and had cerebral palsy. Tallarico’s condition required Tallarico to use a wheelchair, but she could move independently of the chair by crawling. Tallarico could not speak more than short words but had no difficulties hearing and understanding directions and written words. To communicate, Tallarico used various communication tools like communication boards and text-to-sound devices. Tallarico had flown unaccompanied before but ran into difficulties when she attempted to fly with Trans World Airlines, Inc. (Trans World) (defendant). When Trans World agents learned that Tallarico intended to fly alone, the agents contacted their station manager, who denied Tallarico boarding, stating that Tallarico could not take care of herself or exit the plane swiftly in an emergency. Tallarico cried and was upset with Trans World’s decision, and she had to have her father fly in and accompany her on her flight. Tallarico’s demeanor reportedly changed after the altercation, leaving Tallarico significantly more withdrawn. Tallarico filed suit against Trans World in federal district court. Tallarico claimed that by denying her boarding based on her disability, the airline discriminated against her in violation of the Airline Carrier Access Act (ACAA). At trial, a jury found in favor of Tallarico and awarded her damages, including funds for emotional damages. The district court entered judgment notwithstanding the verdict on Tallarico’s damages, reducing the award to include only Tallarico’s out-of-pocket expenses. The case was appealed to the Eighth Circuit, and after determining that the record did not support any punitive damages, the court addressed whether the ACAA created private causes of action or allowed emotional damages to be collected.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Beam, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.