Tallarico v. Trans World Airlines

881 F.2d 566 (1989)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tallarico v. Trans World Airlines

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
881 F.2d 566 (1989)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

Polly Tallarico (plaintiff) was 14 years old and had cerebral palsy. Tallarico’s condition required Tallarico to use a wheelchair, but she could move independently of the chair by crawling. Tallarico could not speak more than short words but had no difficulties hearing and understanding directions and written words. To communicate, Tallarico used various communication tools like communication boards and text-to-sound devices. Tallarico had flown unaccompanied before but ran into difficulties when she attempted to fly with Trans World Airlines, Inc. (Trans World) (defendant). When Trans World agents learned that Tallarico intended to fly alone, the agents contacted their station manager, who denied Tallarico boarding, stating that Tallarico could not take care of herself or exit the plane swiftly in an emergency. Tallarico cried and was upset with Trans World’s decision, and she had to have her father fly in and accompany her on her flight. Tallarico’s demeanor reportedly changed after the altercation, leaving Tallarico significantly more withdrawn. Tallarico filed suit against Trans World in federal district court. Tallarico claimed that by denying her boarding based on her disability, the airline discriminated against her in violation of the Airline Carrier Access Act (ACAA). At trial, a jury found in favor of Tallarico and awarded her damages, including funds for emotional damages. The district court entered judgment notwithstanding the verdict on Tallarico’s damages, reducing the award to include only Tallarico’s out-of-pocket expenses. The case was appealed to the Eighth Circuit, and after determining that the record did not support any punitive damages, the court addressed whether the ACAA created private causes of action or allowed emotional damages to be collected.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Beam, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership