Michigan Supreme Court
59 N.W. 656 (1894)
Smith (defendant) came up to some sheds that he owned when he saw six to eight boys on the roof of one of his sheds. Smith ordered the boys to get down and they immediately got down. Smith then walked around to another shed he owned where he saw two more boys on the roof. Again he ordered the boys off the roof. As the two boys started get down, Smith took a stick and threw it in the direction of one of the boys that he could see. The stick missed the boy and hit Talmage (plaintiff) above the eye. Talmage lost his sight completely as a result of the blow above his eye. Talmage sued Smith for damages. Talmage’s father testified at trial that Smith said he threw the stick intending to hit Byron Smith, one of the other boys on the roof. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Talmage. Smith appealed the jury verdict to the Supreme Court of Michigan.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Montgomery, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.