Tamburo v. P&C Food Markets
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
36 A.D.2d 1017, 321 N.Y.S.2d 487 (1971)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
Carmela Tamburo (plaintiff) allegedly was injured while on the premises of P&C Food Markets, Inc. (P&C) (defendant). On April 29, 1969, the last day before the expiration of the statute of limitations for a negligence claim, Tamburo delivered a summons to the county sheriff for the sheriff to serve on P&C. However, the caption on the summons did not identify the court and county in which Tamburo was bringing suit, as required by Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) § 2101. The sheriff served the summons on P&C on April 29. P&C did not enter an appearance in response to the summons. On June 19, Tamburo delivered a supplemental summons to the sheriff for service on P&C, which the sheriff served on P&C the next day. The supplemental summons specified the court and county. In its answer to the complaint, P&C raised the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense; P&C subsequently moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR § 3211 based on the statute of limitations. Tamburo opposed the motion and cross-moved for an order to amend the caption nunc pro tunc as of April 29 to include the court name and county. The supreme court denied P&C’s motion and granted Tamburo’s motion. P&C appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.


