From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
California Supreme Court
27 Cal. 3d 167, 164 Cal. Rptr. 839, 610 P.2d 1330 (1980)
In 1960, Gordon Tameny (plaintiff) began working as a relief clerk for Atlantic Richfield Company (Arco) (defendant) in California. Tameny’s employment agreement with Arco did not have a definite duration, which made Tameny an at-will employee under California law. Tameny was promoted in 1966 to a retail-sales-representative position, in which he was responsible for managing relationships between Arco and service-station dealers in Bakersfield, California. Beginning in the early 1970s, Arco’s district manager and other Arco employees allegedly began engaging in illegal antitrust activity to fix the retail price of gasoline. Arco employees allegedly pressured Tameny to threaten his Bakersfield service-station dealers to cut their prices to a level designated by Arco. When Tameny refused, Arco fired Tameny. Tameny sued Arco in California state court, seeking compensatory and punitive damages based on Arco’s alleged wrongful discharge of Tameny for refusing to commit a criminal act. Arco demurred, and the trial court dismissed the complaint and entered judgment in Arco’s favor. Tameny appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Tobriner, J.)
Dissent (Clark, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.