From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Tank v. Chronister
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
160 F.3d 597 (1998)
James B. Tank (plaintiff) filed a wrongful-death lawsuit under Kansas state law in federal court against Dr. Bert Chronister and the board of trustees of Wilson County Hospital (collectively, the medical professionals) (defendants), alleging that their negligence caused the death of his mother, Kathleen Tank. James was a citizen of Wisconsin. The medical professionals and Kathleen’s adult daughter (who was James’s sister) were citizens of Kansas. Kathleen was also a Kansas citizen at the time of her death. James filed the lawsuit in federal court on diversity-jurisdiction grounds because he and the medical professionals held citizenship in different states. The medical professionals moved to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. The medical professionals argued that under Kansas law, the plaintiff in a wrongful-death lawsuit acts as a legal representative of the decedent’s estate and is considered a citizen of the decedent’s state of residence for jurisdictional purposes. Because Kathleen and the medical professionals were citizens of Kansas, diversity of citizenship did not exist under this theory. The district court granted the motion to dismiss. James moved for reconsideration. The district court reversed its initial ruling, holding instead that those authorized to bring a wrongful-death lawsuit in Kansas act in their individual capacities and for their own benefit, and therefore, their citizenship should be considered for jurisdictional purposes. The medical professionals appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Briscoe, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 616,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.