Tanner v. Commissioner

45 T.C.M. 1419 (1983), T.C. Memo. 1983-230

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tanner v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
45 T.C.M. 1419 (1983), T.C. Memo. 1983-230

Facts

Ray Tanner, Jr. and Patricia Tanner (plaintiffs) were minority shareholders of Ray Tanner Motors, Inc. (the corporation). Roy was the vice president of the corporation. During 1977 and 1978, the corporation provided the Tanners with three company vehicles for personal use. The corporation paid all maintenance and other fees associated with the vehicles and was never reimbursed for these expenses. The corporation sold each vehicle following the Tanners’ use, and all profits from the sales were included in the corporation’s earnings and profits. The corporation’s earnings and profits during 1977 and 1978 were at least equal to the fair market value of the Tanners’ use of the vehicles. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the Commissioner) (defendant) determined that the Tanners’ use of the vehicles constituted constructive dividends and was therefore taxable as income. The Commissioner assessed a deficiency based on the fair market value of the Tanners’ use of the vehicles.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wiles, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership