Tarpeh-Doe v. United States
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
771 F. Supp. 427 (1991)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
American citizen Linda Tarpeh-Doe (plaintiff) worked in Liberia for the U.S. Department of State (defendant) when she gave birth to Nyenpan Tarpeh-Doe. The State Department assumed the duty of providing overseas employees with better medical care than that locally available, but negligently supervised the doctor who treated Nyenpan for an illness shortly after birth. Nyenpan suffered debilitating neurological injuries as a result. Tarpeh-Doe moved back to the United States, where Nyenpan lived in a facility with constant and total care. By the time Nyenpan was eight years old, Tarpeh-Doe brought a Federal Tort Claims Act suit to recover damages, including lost income Nyenpan would have earned as an adult. The parties hired experts who disputed Nyenpan’s life expectancy and lost future earnings. Tarpeh-Doe’s expert economist used average income for an American male over a 38-year work life to calculate potential earnings of $1,008,434. The State Department’s expert used lower figures for a black male who did not work his entire life in the United States, because Nyenpan was born in Liberia to a black father. But meanwhile, his father had obtained American citizenship and was working in the States, and Tarpeh-Doe is white. Before reaching its decision, the court asked the State Department economist to calculate average earnings for all American college graduates without regard to gender or race.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Oberdorfer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.