Tartaglia v. Hatten (In re Estate of Hatten)

880 So. 2d 1271 (2004)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tartaglia v. Hatten (In re Estate of Hatten)

Florida District Court of Appeal
880 So. 2d 1271 (2004)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Louise Hatten, decedent, had seven siblings and an approximately $700,000 estate. Louise’s will left her estate to only four of her siblings, Antoinette Tartaglia, Jeanette Kidd, Anthony Hatten (the beneficiary siblings) (plaintiffs), and Helen Parker. Louise allowed Antoinette to read her executed will. Shortly before her death, Louise told Anthony and Jeanette about the will’s contents and reaffirmed that she intentionally disinherited the other three siblings. After Louise’s death, Antoinette, along with one of Louise’s disinherited siblings, Louis Hatten (defendant), went to Louise’s home. While at Louise’s home, Louis gathered and took all of Louise’s personal papers. Louis did not tell anyone whether the papers he took included Louise’s will. After Louis’s visit, Louise’s will could not be found. Antoinette testified that she believed Louis had found Louise’s will, discovered it disinherited him, and then destroyed it. Louis then petitioned to have Louise’s estate administered as an intestate estate. The beneficiary siblings filed a claim for tortious interference with testamentary expectancy, alleging that Louis maliciously destroyed Louise’s will and that, as a result, each beneficiary sibling would only receive their intestate share, $100,000, rather than the $175,000 share each would have received under the will. Louis moved for summary judgment, and the trial court granted it. The beneficiary siblings appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cope, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership