Taub v. State
Maryland Court of Appeals
296 Md. 439, 463 A.2d 819 (1983)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
Edward Taub (defendant) directed animal research at the Institute for Behavioral Research (IBR). After IBR received a grant and funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Taub began researching how individuals who had suffered a stroke could retrain their limbs. As part of Taub’s research, he performed a surgical procedure on monkeys that resulted in the monkeys losing sensation of the limbs. In 1982, the State of Maryland (plaintiff) charged Taub with 17 counts of animal cruelty in violation of the Maryland Code (1957, 1976 Repl. Vol.), Article 27, § 59. A jury found Taub had violated Section 59 by failing to provide six of the monkeys with necessary care. Taub appealed. On appeal, Taub was found guilty of failing to provide one of the monkeys with necessary care. The Maryland Court of Appeals then granted certiorari to consider whether Section 59 applied to a research facility receiving federal funds.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Couch, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.