Taylor v. Louisiana
United States Supreme Court
419 U.S. 522 (1975)
Taylor (defendant) was indicted for aggravated kidnapping. Taylor petitioned the trial court to squash the petit jury venire. At the time, Louisiana had a statute that excluded women from jury service unless she filed a written statement expressing that she wanted to be subject to jury service. In the relevant judicial district, 53 percent of the people eligible for jury service were women. Statistics indicate that very few women actually filed such written declarations and few women actually sat on juries. Taylor claimed that the systematic exclusion of women from the venire deprived him of his constitutional right to a jury constituting a fair cross-section of the community.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
Dissent (Rehnquist, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.