Taylor v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

524 F.2d 263 (1975)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Taylor v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
524 F.2d 263 (1975)

Facts

Taylor (plaintiff), a former employee at the Denver frozen-food warehouse of Safeway Stores, Inc. (Safeway) (defendant), sued Safeway for race-based discrimination after Taylor was discharged from his job. Taylor sought to certify a class of basically all Black persons who were or ever could be or could have been employed by Safeway in Colorado. The district court tentatively certified the class but limited it to Black employees at Safeway’s Denver frozen-food warehouse because Taylor could not meet Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a)(3)’s typicality requirement. After a trial on the merits, the district court found for Taylor only on the allegation that Taylor’s immediate supervisor’s actions towards Taylor were racially motivated and negatively influenced Taylor’s productivity. The district court awarded Taylor backpay and attorney’s fees, but it refused to reinstate him. The district court also found no merit for the class-action claim and refused to award attorney’s fees for that claim. Taylor appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lewis, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership