From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Taylor v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
130 Ariz. 516 (1981)
Dennis Taylor (plaintiff) was driving his car with his wife, Kathy, as a passenger, when Taylor’s car collided with a train at a railroad crossing. Kathy died as a result of the accident. At the time of the crash, Taylor and Kathy had been married for approximately two months. Taylor sued Southern Pacific Transportation Company (defendant), which owned the train, and the driver of the train, alleging wrongful death. Before trial, Taylor had remarried. Taylor sought damages related to the loss of his wife, including loss of homemaking services and loss of the income that Kathy would have been expected to contribute to the marriage. Prior to trial, Taylor requested that the trial court prohibit any mention of or reference to Taylor’s remarriage. The trial court granted Taylor’s motion in limine. However, Southern Pacific’s attorney made two references to Taylor’s remarriage during the cross-examination of Taylor, asking whether Taylor had been implying that Taylor had gone without homemaking services since Kathy’s death and asking Taylor how many times Taylor had been married. After these references, Taylor requested that the trial court declare a mistrial, and the trial court deferred ruling until the end of the trial. The jury returned a verdict for Taylor of $7,000 in compensatory damages and $200 in punitive damages. The trial court then determined that Southern Pacific’s attorney had violated the court’s pretrial order and granted the request for a mistrial. Southern Pacific appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cameron, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.