Supreme Court of the United States
495 U.S. 575
Arthur Lajuane Taylor (defendant) pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Taylor had four prior convictions: one for robbery, one for assault, and two for second-degree burglary under Missouri law. Given these prior convictions, the prosecution sought a sentence enhancement under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), which authorizes sentence enhancements for individuals who violate section 922(g) and who have three previous convictions for certain crimes that present a serious potential risk of physical injury to another. Taylor opposed the prosecution’s request for the sentence enhancement on the ground that his burglary convictions did not involve conduct that presented such a risk. Under the terms of his guilty plea, Taylor had a right to appeal the enhancement. Taylor exercised this right and appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.