TC Skyward Aviation U.S., Inc. v. Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
557 F. Supp. 3d 477 (2021)

- Written by Kate Douglas, JD
Facts
TAM Linhad Aereas, S.A. (TAM) and 777 Leasing, LLC entered into a sale and leaseback agreement (agreement) pursuant to which 777 Leasing agreed to buy from and lease back to TAM certain airline components (inventory). To fund the purchase, 777 Leasing entered into a financing agreement with TC Skyward Aviation U.S., Inc. (TC) (plaintiff), which granted TC a lien in the inventory. As required by the agreement, TAM caused Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch (bank) (defendant) to issue an irrevocable standby letter of credit (LOC) in TC’s favor. TC was entitled to draw on the LOC when money became due and payable by TAM under the agreement. Under the agreement, TAM’s default, including the filing of a bankruptcy petition, rendered certain amounts payable. The LOC provided that the bank would pay TC upon the submission of a draw request and specific supporting documentation. After TAM filed for bankruptcy, TC submitted a draw request to the bank in accordance with the LOC’s requirements. TAM objected, asserting that no money was due and owing under the agreement and that TAM had not defaulted. TAM further argued that the agreement clause purporting to define a default as the filing of a bankruptcy petition violated the bankruptcy code and was unenforceable. The bank refused to pay. TC sued for wrongful dishonor. The bank moved to dismiss, asserting the affirmative defense of fraud. TC moved for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Daniels, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.