Technical Assistance International v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
150 F.3d 1369 (1998)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Technical Assistance International, Inc. (TAI) (plaintiff) won a bid to contract with the United States government (defendant) to maintain the US Army’s vehicles at one of its bases. The contract was based in part on the government’s estimate of how quickly it would replace vehicles. Due to many factors, including a surplus of vehicles at other bases, the government ended up replacing vehicles more frequently than estimated, resulting in less work for TAI under the contract. TAI sued the government, claiming that this increased replacement rate violated the contract. TAI argued that buyer decisions affecting the estimates that underlie a requirements contract could constitute a breach. The United States Court of Appeals for Federal Claims ruled in favor of TAI, holding that a contractor in a requirements contract assumes the risk only for changes in the “indigenous needs” of the other party, and that the government’s surplus in other fleets did not qualify. The government appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bryson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.