From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Telnikoff v. Matsuevitch
Maryland Court of Appeals
347 Md. 561, 702 A.2d 230 (1997)
Journalist Vladimir Telkinoff (defendant) wrote a newspaper article published in England that criticized the British Broadcasting Corporation’s radio-broadcast reports to Russians. Vladimir Matsuevitch (plaintiff), another journalist, wrote a letter responding to Telnikoff’s article, which was published in the newspaper. Matsuevitch’s letter accused Telnikoff of advocating racialism, anti-Semitism, and racial discrimination. Telnikoff filed a libel action against Matsuevitch in the English High Court of Justice. Telnikoff, a known journalist for a public radio station, was a public figure. The case was resolved in Telnikoff’s favor without any evidence that Matsuevitch’s letter was false or that Matsuevitch acted with actual malice. Telnikoff tried and failed to have the judgment against Matsuevitch enforced in the United States. Matsuevitch filed suit in federal court, and the district court entered a judgment in favor of Matsuevitch. The district court found that the cause of action for libel was repugnant to Maryland public policy and recognizing the foreign award would be repugnant to the policies of both Maryland and the United States. Telnikoff appealed. Following oral arguments, the appellate court certified to the Maryland Court of Appeals the question of whether judicial recognition of Telnikoff’s judgment would be repugnant to Maryland public policy. Telnikoff argued that the English judgment must be recognized under the principles of comity, and Matsuevitch asserted that the judgment was repugnant to state and national public policy and should not be recognized.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Eldridge, J.)
Dissent (Chasanow, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.