From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Temple v. City of Petersburg
Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals
182 Va. 418, 29 S.E.2d 357 (1944)
The city of Petersburg, Virginia (the city) (defendant), desiring to provide a proper place to re-inter bodies that had been exhumed from a strip of land at a local cemetery that had been taken by eminent domain for a road improvement, sought to enlarge the cemetery by adding a tract of 1.01 adjoining acres of land that the city acquired in 1942 for cemetery purposes. Temple, (homeowners) (plaintiffs), whose residence was 70 feet from the proposed enlargement at the nearest point, sued the city for violating a state statute that provided that “[n]o cemetery shall hereafter be established within the corporate limits of any city or town; . . . nor within two hundred and fifty yards of any residence without the consent of the owner.” The trial court initially temporarily restrained the city from using the 1.01-acre lot for an addition to the cemetery but eventually dissolved the injunction and denied relief to the homeowners who appealed. The homeowners argued that the purpose of the statute was to protect residences and lands from the ill effects growing out of proximity to a cemetery and that enlargement of an existing cemetery constitutes the establishment of a cemetery within the meaning of the statute. Otherwise, they argued, it makes no sense to protect residences against the establishment of a cemetery but not the enlargement of existing cemeteries because the evil created by one is the same as that created by the other. The city, however, argued that enlarging an existing cemetery is not the establishment of a cemetery as the word is used in the statute and the “hereafter established” language clearly does not mean that an already existing cemetery may not hereafter be enlarged and, therefore, it had not violated the statute.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Gregory, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.