Temple v. Synthes Corp.
United States Supreme Court
498 U.S. 5, 111 S.Ct. 315, 112 L.Ed.2d 263 (1990), rehearing denied 498 U.S. 1042 (1991)
- Written by Matt Fyock, JD
Facts
Temple (plaintiff), a Mississippi resident, underwent surgery in a Louisiana hospital, during which the doctor implanted a plate and screw device in his spine. The device was manufactured by Synthes, (defendant). One of the device's screws broke off inside Temple's back after surgery. Temple filed suit against Synthes in federal district court and against the hospital and doctor who performed the surgery in a Louisiana state court. Synthes moved to dismiss Temple's federal claim, arguing that Temple had failed to join the doctor and hospital as necessary parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19. The district court, citing judicial economy, ordered Temple to join the doctor and hospital within 20 days. When Temple failed to do so, the court dismissed the suit. Temple appealed, but the court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 787,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.