Tempo Shain Corp. v. Bertek, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
120 F.3d 16 (1997)

- Written by Emily Pokora, JD
Facts
Neptune Plus Corporation (Neptune) (plaintiff) was an affiliated company of Tempo Shain Corporation (Tempo). Neptune contracted with Bertek, Inc. (defendant) to obtain a license from Gelman Sciences, Inc. (Gelman) to use a patented repellant treatment for materials. Neptune initiated arbitration against Bertek, alleging breach of contract and fraudulent inducement of contract. Bertek responded, counterclaiming with the same claims as Neptune. During the hearing, Bertek sought to call its former president, Wayne Pollock, as a witness to provide testimony regarding contract negotiations. Pollock became unavailable due to his wife’s cancer diagnosis. Over objection by Bertek, the arbitration panel proceeded with the hearing, issuing an award in Neptune’s favor on both claims. The panel commented that Pollock’s testimony would have been merely cumulative of other evidence, including reports Pollock received and correspondence between Pollock and Neptune’s president, Robin Delaney. The reports involved accounting records that were the topic of the correspondence between Pollock and Delaney. The correspondence described problems between the companies that they were trying to resolve with plans of action in order to continue the relationship. The letters did not include evidence going to the fraudulent-inducement claim by either party, which only Pollock could testify to because he was the only individual negotiating on Bertek’s behalf. Neptune alleged that Bertek made misrepresentations that were undocumented, with the only evidence to refute Neptune’s claims being Pollock’s testimony. No other witness could testify in place of Pollock, which Neptune conceded. Neptune filed a petition in district court to confirm the arbitration award. Bertek responded, seeking to vacate the award on the basis of arbitrator misconduct under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)(3). The district court upheld the award. Bertek appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Parker, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.