Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. Tennessee Valley Authority
United States Supreme Court
306 U.S. 118 (1939)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Congress created a federal corporation, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) (defendant), which used federally owned dams and navigable waters to generate and sell electricity in Tennessee. The Tennessee Electric Power Company and other existing electricity companies (collectively, the power companies) (plaintiffs) sued the TVA in state court. The power companies alleged that the TVA’s competition in the electricity market was harming them and that the harm was unlawful. Specifically, the power companies alleged that the TVA’s competition (1) violated the Fifth Amendment by depriving the power companies of property, i.e., profits, without due process and (2) violated the Tenth Amendment by indirectly setting electricity rates in violation of Tennessee’s state rights. The TVA removed the case to federal court. Among other arguments, the TVA claimed that the power companies lacked standing because the power companies’ claimed competitive injury was a damnum absque injuria, i.e., a loss that was not caused by a legal injury. A three-judge district-court panel held a trial and ruled against the power companies. The power companies appealed directly to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, J.)
Dissent (Butler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

