Tennessee Secondary Schools Athletic Association v. Brentwood Academy
United States Supreme Court
551 U.S. 291, 127 S. Ct. 2489, 168 L. Ed. 2d 166 (2007)

- Written by Emily Laird, JD
Facts
Brentwood Academy (plaintiff) sued the Tennessee Secondary Schools Athletic Association (TSSAA) (defendant) in federal court over TSSAA’s enforcement of a rule preventing the recruitment of middle school athletes. Brentwood voluntarily joined the TSSAA, a not-for-profit organization that regulated many public and private high schools in Tennessee. When Brentwood joined the TSSAA, it agreed to follow TSSAA’s antirecruiting rules, which prevented high schools from recruiting individual middle school students. TSSAA created these rules to prevent the exploitation of children, to prioritize academics over sports, and to promote fair competition among schools. Despite Brentwood’s status as a TSSAA member, its head football coach solicited talented eighth-grade athletes with a personal letter inviting the boys to attend practices and signed the letter, “Your Coach.” TSSAA sanctioned Brentwood Academy after conducting an investigation, holding meetings and a hearing on the issue, and providing a written determination. TSSAA also held a review of the sanction. Brentwood sued TSSAA in federal court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming TSSAA acted as a state actor and violated Brentwood’s First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Initially, the federal district court granted Brentwood’s motion for summary judgment and enjoined enforcement of the antirecruitment rules. On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed, finding that TSSAA was not a state actor. The United States Supreme Court reversed, holding TSSAA was a state actor for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On remand, the Sixth Circuit sent the case back to the federal district court, which focused its review on Brentwood’s claim that the sanction violated due process and Brentwood’s First Amendment rights. For a second time, the lower court ruled in favor of Brentwood. The Sixth Circuit affirmed. TSSAA appealed, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.