Teran v. Rittley
Michigan Court of Appeals
882 N.W.2d 181 (2015)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Michael Rittley (defendant) was stationed in Quito, Ecuador, where he fathered a child with Susana Teran (plaintiff). Rittley then left the country without providing his contact information to Teran. A few years later, Teran filed a paternity action in the United States to determine custody and child support. A paternity test established that Rittley was the father. The friend of the court (FOC)—the investigative and enforcement arm of the Michigan family-court system—recommended a child-support order of $1,211 per month based on the standard formula. Rittley argued that the amount should be lower because the cost of living is much lower in Ecuador—a disparity established by testimony from an economics expert. The trial court rejected this argument and set child support at the $1,211 monthly amount. Rittley appealed. The Michigan Court of Appeals granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
