Terminiello v. City of Chicago
United States Supreme Court
337 U.S. 1 (1949)
Father Arthur Terminiello (defendant) gave a controversial speech at a Chicago auditorium. Angry protesters assembled outside, and despite police attempts to maintain order, several disturbances ensued. The City of Chicago (plaintiff) prosecuted Terminiello under a city ordinance prohibiting speech that "stirs the public to anger, invites dispute, brings about a condition of unrest, or creates a disturbance." At trial, Terminiello raised no objection to a jury instruction based on this wording. The jury found Terminiello guilty. On appeal, Terminiello argued the ordinance violated his constitutional right to free speech. The Illinois Appellate Court and Illinois Supreme Court both upheld the trial verdict. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J.)
Dissent (Vinson, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.