Terminiello v. City of Chicago
United States Supreme Court
337 U.S. 1 (1949)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Father Arthur Terminiello (defendant) gave a controversial speech at a Chicago auditorium denouncing alleged communists in the United States. Angry protesters assembled outside. During the speech, Terminiello criticized the protestors, as well as certain racial and political groups. Despite police attempts to maintain order, several disturbances ensued. The City of Chicago (plaintiff) prosecuted Terminiello for a breach of the peace. Specifically, the city alleged that Terminiello had violated a city ordinance prohibiting speech that (1) stirred the public to anger, (2) invited dispute, (3) brought about a condition of unrest, or (4) created a disturbance. At trial, Terminiello argued that, as applied to him, the ordinance violated his First Amendment right to free speech. However, Terminiello did not object to the trial court instructing the jury using the ordinance’s full wording. The jury found Terminiello guilty. The Illinois Appellate Court and Illinois Supreme Court both upheld the trial verdict. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J.)
Dissent (Jackson, J.)
Dissent (Vinson, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.