Terracon Consultants Western, Inc. v. Mandalay Resort Group
Nevada Supreme Court
206 P.3d 81 (2009)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
Mandalay Resort Group and related entities (collectively, Mandalay) (plaintiffs) managed the construction of a resort and casino in Las Vegas, Nevada. Mandalay hired numerous subcontractors, including Terracon Consultants Western, Inc. (Terracon) (defendant). Under the contract between Mandalay and Terracon, Terracon agreed to provide professional engineering advice related to the design of the resort’s foundation. Terracon would not be involved with the actual construction of the foundation. Based on Terracon’s analysis of the soil and the anticipated weight of the building, Terracon predicted a certain amount of settling underneath the foundation. The final amount of settling was greater, and county officials required Mandalay to repair and reinforce the foundation before proceeding with construction. Mandalay sued Terracon for damages in state court, asserting claims of breach of contract and professional negligence. Terracon removed the matter to federal district court and filed a motion for partial summary judgment on the professional-negligence claim. Terracon argued that Mandalay’s negligence-based claim was barred as a matter of law by the economic-loss doctrine. It was undisputed that Terracon’s allegedly deficient engineering advice did not cause Mandalay to suffer personal injury or property damage. The Nevada Supreme Court accepted a certified legal question from the district court on the scope of the economic-loss doctrine.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gibbons, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.