Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Terry Barr Sales Agency, Inc. v. All-Lock Company, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
96 F.3d 174 (1996)


Facts

All-Lock Company, Inc. (All-Lock) (defendant) was a manufacturer of locks and latches for automobiles. In 1973, All-Lock entered into an oral agreement with Terry Barr Sales Agency, Inc. (Barr) (plaintiff). Under the agreement, Barr would sell All-Lock’s products to automobile manufacturers in exchange for a commission. Additionally, Barr would service some pre-existing sales that were previously serviced directly by All-Lock. These inherited accounts were subject to a reduced commission rate. Barr and All-Lock did not discuss whether the agreement covered post-termination commissions. A fairly common practice in these types of agreements was for the sales agent to be paid for the life of the part because of the resources required to procure an initial contract. Once the contract was obtained, buyers could continue ordering the same parts for many years. In 1994, All-Lock terminated the oral agreement with Barr and refused to pay post-termination commissions after 90 days. All-Lock asserted that the course of performance of the agreement established that All-Lock and Barr did not intend for the agreement to provide for post-termination commissions. There were several situations in which Barr did not request post-termination commissions, but these situations either involved former employees of Barr or represented insignificant commissions. Barr sued All-Lock for breach of contract. The district court granted summary judgment to All-Lock, and Barr appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Martin, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.