Teson v. Vasquez

561 S.W.2d 119 (1977)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Teson v. Vasquez

Missouri Court of Appeals
561 S.W.2d 119 (1977)

Facts

In 1950, Leo and Velma Vasquez (defendants) received title through a deed to property between Aubuchon Road and the Missouri River. In 1969, Lawrence Teson (plaintiff) filed an action seeking to have title to some of this property quieted in his name. Teson maintained that he cleared and farmed the property. In 1972, Teson claimed title to the property by adverse possession, and Sommers, Keeven, and Behle were added as plaintiffs. The trial court found that Teson had established title by adverse possession to property between Cowmire Creek to Round Pound, as well as property near the river. Sommers claimed title to land that was conveyed to him through a 1952 deed. Sommers traded the use of a portion of the land to a seminary. The trial court ruled that Sommers had established title by adverse possession. Keeven and Behle claimed title to land that was conveyed to them through a 1963 deed from the Hagens. The trial court ruled that they had established their title by adverse possession. The Vasquzes appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gunn, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership