Tetris Holding, LLC. v. Xio Interactive, Inc.
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
863 F. Supp. 2d 394 (2012)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
Tetris Holding, LLC (plaintiff) held the copyright for Tetris, a puzzle video game in which a user manipulated game pieces made of colorful square blocks. The pieces came in seven different shapes and fell from the top of the screen before accumulating at the bottom. The user manipulated the falling pieces to fill all spaces along a horizontal line at the bottom of the screen. If the goal was accomplished, the completed line of block vanished, and the user was awarded points and could continue playing. If the pieces accumulated to the top of the screen, the game was over. Tetris gained massive popularity, and Xio Interactive, Inc. (Xio) (defendant) created Mino, a puzzle game based on Tetris. Xio examined Tetris and copied significant amounts of the game to capitalize on Tetris’s popularity. Xio conducted extensive legal research on copyright law and attempted to exclusively copy those elements of Tetris that Xio believed to be uncopyrightable. Xio replicated the Tetris piece structure and options, game board, square-block composition of the pieces, and bright colors, among other game aspects. Tetris Holding filed suit against Xio for infringement of the copyright and trade dress of Tetris. Xio openly admitted to copying Tetris but argued that the copied elements were dictated by functional considerations and the underlying game idea and were not copyrightable. Both parties filed for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wolfson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.