Tewari v. Tsoutsouras
New York Court of Appeals
75 N.Y.2d 1, 550 N.Y.S.2d 572, 549 N.E.2d 1143 (1989)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
Phyllis Tewari (plaintiff) sued Dr. Steven Tsoutsouras (defendant) for medical malpractice. Tsoutsouras answered and sought discovery from Tewari. Tewari neither responded to the discovery requests nor filed a notice of medical-malpractice action as required by Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) § 3406(a). Tsoutsouras moved to dismiss Tewari’s complaint for her failure to file a § 3406(a) notice. In response, Tewari sought to explain her discovery delay, claimed that she did not deliberately violate § 3406(a), and moved for a filing-deadline extension. The supreme court denied Tsoutsouras’s dismissal motion. The appellate division reversed, ruling that Tewari was not entitled to an extension because her failure to comply with § 3406(a) was an unexcused pleading defect. The appellate division thus dismissed Tewari’s suit. Tewari appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Alexander, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.