Texaco, Inc. v. Hasbrouck
United States Supreme Court
496 U.S. 543 (1990)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
Texaco, Inc. (defendant) sold gasoline to independent Texaco retailers in Spokane, Washington, at retail prices and to two distributors, Gull Oil Company and Dompier Oil Company (collectively, the distributors) at discounted prices. The distributors supplied gasoline to other service stations and directly to consumers. Because the distributors received a discount on gasoline from Texaco, the distributors and the service stations that were supplied by the distributors were able to sell gasoline to consumers at lower prices than those offered by the independent retailers. Between 1972 and 1981, the distributors increased their sales of gasoline while the sales made by the independent retailers declined. Twelve independent Texaco retailers (the independent retailers) (plaintiffs) sued Texaco in federal district court under § 2(a) of the Robinson-Patman Act, alleging that Texaco engaged in illegal price discrimination. Texaco defended its practices, arguing that the distributors were wholesalers and that the lower prices Texaco charged the distributors were functional discounts that were justified under the Robinson-Patman Act. Texaco defined a functional discount as a discount given to a purchaser based on the services performed by the purchaser for the seller. At trial, a jury found that Texaco had violated § 2(a). The court of appeals remanded the case for a new trial. At the second trial, the district court did not allow Texaco to present its defense that the functional discounts were justified. The jury again found that Texaco had violated § 2(a). The court of appeals affirmed, and Texaco appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.