Texaco Inc. v. Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of North Dakota
448 N.W.2d 621, 109 O. & G.R. 25 (1989)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The North Dakota Oil and Gas Conservation Act (Act) permitted the North Dakota Industrial Commission (Commission) (defendant) to set up spacing units in order to protect against waste and to protect correlative rights. Once a spacing unit was established, only one well could be drilled within each unit. The Commission established a spacing unit that included lands on which both Texaco Inc. (Texaco) (plaintiff) and Harley Thompson owned mineral interests. Subsequently, Texaco drilled a well in the unit. Approximately seven months later, Thompson petitioned the Commission for compulsory pooling of all mineral interests, including his and Texaco’s, within the spacing unit that was previously established. The Commission granted Thompson’s petition and ordered compulsory pooling within the spacing unit retroactive to the date Texaco began drilling operations. Texaco appealed in trial court, arguing that the order should not be retroactive because Thompson had taken no part in the drilling operations. The trial court affirmed the Commission’s order. Texaco appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Erickstad, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.