Texas Beef Group v. Winfrey
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
201 F.3d 680 (2000)
- Written by Brett Stavin, JD
Facts
Oprah Winfrey (defendant) hosted a talk show. Sometime after an outbreak of mad cow disease in Great Britain, Winfrey hosted an episode dedicated to dangerous foods. The episode included a segment on mad cow disease in which Winfrey stated that news of the disease caused her to stop cold from eating another burger. Additionally, several guests on the episode shared their views on the subject. Howard Lyman (defendant) asserted that mad cow disease would make AIDS look like the common cold. Lyman additionally accused the federal government of failing to take substantial measures to prevent an outbreak of mad cow disease in the United States. Lyman based his opinion on the federal government’s failure to ban ruminant-to-ruminant feeding, even though the industry had already instituted a voluntary ban. Following the airing of the episode, the market for beef crashed. Texas cattle ranchers, through the Texas Beef Group (plaintiff), sued Winfrey and Lyman in federal court under the Texas Disparagement of Perishable Foods Act and common-law business disparagement. The district court ruled against the Texas Beef Group, and the Texas Beef Group appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.