Texas Beef Group v. Winfrey

201 F.3d 680 (2000)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Texas Beef Group v. Winfrey

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
201 F.3d 680 (2000)

  • Written by Brett Stavin, JD

Facts

Oprah Winfrey (defendant) hosted a talk show. Sometime after an outbreak of mad cow disease in Great Britain, Winfrey hosted an episode dedicated to dangerous foods. The episode included a segment on mad cow disease in which Winfrey stated that news of the disease caused her to stop cold from eating another burger. Additionally, several guests on the episode shared their views on the subject. Howard Lyman (defendant) asserted that mad cow disease would make AIDS look like the common cold. Lyman additionally accused the federal government of failing to take substantial measures to prevent an outbreak of mad cow disease in the United States. Lyman based his opinion on the federal government’s failure to ban ruminant-to-ruminant feeding, even though the industry had already instituted a voluntary ban. Following the airing of the episode, the market for beef crashed. Texas cattle ranchers, through the Texas Beef Group (plaintiff), sued Winfrey and Lyman in federal court under the Texas Disparagement of Perishable Foods Act and common-law business disparagement. The district court ruled against the Texas Beef Group, and the Texas Beef Group appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership