Texas Department of State Health Services v. Crown Distributing LLC

647 S.W.3d 648 (2022)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Texas Department of State Health Services v. Crown Distributing LLC

Texas Supreme Court
647 S.W.3d 648 (2022)

SC

Facts

In 2018, a federal law passed classifying hemp as an agricultural product. The law permitted each state to determine how hemp would be regulated in that individual state. The State of Texas passed a law generally permitting the manufacture of hemp products but prohibiting the manufacture of hemp products for smoking. Crown Distributing LLC and other manufacturers of smokable hemp products (collectively, the manufacturers) (plaintiffs) sued the Texas Department of State Health Services (defendant), challenging the prohibition based on the due-process clause in the Texas Constitution. The clause stated that Texas citizens’ right to life, liberty, and property could not be taken absent due course of law. The manufacturers claimed that their right to produce smokable hemp products was a constitutionally protected property right.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Boyd, J.)

Concurrence (Young, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership