Texas Instruments, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission

805 F.2d 1558 (1986)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Texas Instruments, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
805 F.2d 1558 (1986)

  • Written by Brett Stavin, JD

Facts

Texas Instruments, Inc. (TI) (plaintiff) held U.S. Patent No. 3,819,921 (the ’921 patent), which had the title Miniature Electronic Calculator. Claim 1(a) of the ’921 patent consisted of the calculator’s input means, which included a keyboard for entering digits of numbers and commands. The keyboard included only one set of decimal number keys to be entered in sequence. Claim 1(b) consisted of the calculator’s electronic means, which included an integrated semiconductor array for performing mathematical functions as ordered by the decimals and commands entered into the keyboard, with the array being located in one plane and no larger than the keyboard. The ’921 patent described the electronic means as using only bipolar transistors. Claim 1(d) described the entire calculator as being contained within pocket-sized housing. Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, TI filed an action with the United States International Trade Commission (defendant) against the importers of certain foreign calculators. TI alleged that the foreign calculators infringed on the ’921 patent. An administrative-law judge (ALJ) found that the foreign calculators did not infringe on the ’921 patent. As to claim 1(a) of the ’921 patent, the ALJ found that the foreign calculators used a scanning matrix system that did not operate in substantially the same way as the TI calculator. As to claim 1(b), the ALJ found that the foreign calculators used a single integrated circuit that was not the equivalent of the TI calculator. Instead of bipolar transistors, the foreign calculators used metal-oxide semiconductor (MOS) transistors. The ALJ found that this distinction weighed against infringement. The ALJ also relied partially on the size of the foreign calculators, which were significantly smaller than the TI calculator. TI appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Newman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership