Texas Lawyers Insurance Exchange v. Resolution Trust Corp.
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
822 F. Supp. 380 (1993)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
Texas Lawyers Insurance Exchange (TLIE) (plaintiff) was a legal malpractice insurance company. TLIE provided malpractice insurance policies to the law firm of Eikenburg & Stiles. Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) (defendant) was involved in litigation against Eikenburg & Stiles. RTC issued a subpoena duces tecum to TLIE seeking production of documents related to Eikenburg & Stiles pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1818(n). Under § 1818(n), an agency or party to proceedings brought pursuant to that section may seek to enforce a subpoena through the district courts. TLIE maintained that the documents subpoenaed were privileged and brought suit in district court to quash or modify the subpoena duces tecum. TLIE argued that the district court had jurisdiction to hear the motion to quash because, otherwise, § 1818(n) would subject TLIE to immediate prosecution if it failed to comply with the subpoena. RTC moved to dismiss the action on the ground that § 1818(n) was not self-executing. RTC argued that, because RTC was required to first initiate a court action to compel compliance, the district court lacked jurisdiction. The magistrate judge issued a report finding the subpoena was not self-executing and recommending the district court dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nowlin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.