Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Rigsby
United States Supreme Court
241 U.S. 33 (1916)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
Rigsby (plaintiff) worked as a switchman for the Texas & Pacific Railway Company (Railway) (defendant). On September 4, 1912, Rigsby was moving railcars to an area for repairs. In doing so, he stood on top of a boxcar, where the handbrake was located. While disembarking, he fell and was injured on account of defective handholds or grab-irons making up the boxcar’s ladder. Rigsby sued the Railway pursuant to the Federal Safety Appliance Acts of 1893 and 1910, which required all railcars to be equipped with secure ladders, handholds, and grab-irons. A jury awarded damages to Rigsby, and the circuit court of appeals affirmed. The Railway sought review in the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pitney, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.