Texas Review Society v. Cunningham
United States District Court for the District of Texas
659 F. Supp. 1239 (1987)
- Written by Mike Begovic, JD
Facts
The University of Texas at Austin (UT) (defendants) enacted a rule prohibiting solicitation on campus whereby student organizations were prohibited from handing out or selling newspapers with advertisements in the West Mall area. Distribution of such periodicals or newspapers was limited to two specific areas and could only be done from unmanned racks or vending machines. The Texas Review Society (TRS) (plaintiffs) was a registered student organization at UT with conservative political leanings. TRS had a table in the West Mall area, from which it would attempt to recruit new members, engage in conversations, and distribute its newspapers. TRS produced and distributed a conservative student opinion journal on campus, which contained advertisements and was thereby subject to the solicitation rule. TRS complained that the rule limited its ability to distribute newspapers to students in violation of the First Amendment. As evidence, TRS pointed to data it gathered showing that it could not distribute as many papers by referring students to the unmanned racks instead of giving the papers out at their student-organization table in the West Mall area. UT defended its rule as a necessary restriction to prevent unlimited commercial solicitation to students on campus. At trial, testimony revealed that UT was in no way enforcing the solicitation rule selectively or targeting TRS for its political views.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nowlin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.