Texas v. Lesage

528 U.S. 18 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Texas v. Lesage

United States Supreme Court
528 U.S. 18 (1999)

  • Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD

Facts

Francois Daniel Lesage (plaintiff), an African immigrant, applied to the counseling psychology Ph.D. program at the University of Texas (the school) (defendant). During the year Lesage applied, the school had 223 applicants for this program and accepted 20 students. The school considered an applicant’s race during the application process in addition to the applicant’s qualifications. Lesage was rejected and sued the school in federal district court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for damages and injunctive relief. The school argued that Lesage would not have been accepted regardless of the school’s consideration of Lesage’s race. Many other students had better scores than Lesage, and the school found Lesage’s application weak. The district court therefore granted the school summary judgment. The court of appeals reversed, holding that because race was impermissibly considered in the application process, Lesage had suffered an implied injury. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership