From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Textile Unlimited, Inc. v. A..BMH and Company, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
240 F.3d 781 (2001)
Over a period of ten months, Textile Unlimited, Inc. (Textile) (plaintiff) purchased yarn on thirty-eight separate occasions from A..BMH and Company, Inc. (BMH) (defendant). Each time, Textile sent a purchase order to a broker containing the date, item number, item description, quantity ordered, and price. BMH always responded with an invoice, followed by shipment of the yarn and an order acknowledgement. The order acknowledgement always contained additional terms not included in Textile’s purchase orders. These terms provided that any disputes would be resolved by arbitration in Atlanta, Georgia, under the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. The arbitration was to be governed by Georgia law, and any court action was to be brought solely within the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia. BMH also included a provision in the fine print stating that Textile was “deemed to have accepted these terms in full” if Textile did not respond within 24 hours. Textile did not respond within 24 hours of receiving any of BMH’s order acknowledgements. In September 1998, Textile refused to pay for a shipment of yarn from BMH because the yarn was defective. BMH submitted the dispute to arbitration in Georgia. Textile objected to the arbitration on the ground that the BMH’s arbitration clause was not part of the contract between Textile and BMH. Textile filed an action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to enjoin the arbitration. The district court held for Textile and preliminarily enjoined the pending arbitration. BMH appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 518,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.