The Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Jolley
Utah Supreme Court
467 P.2d 984 (1970)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
While working as an accountant for the Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the church) (plaintiff), LaMar Kay embezzled funds to buy a new Pontiac Firebird and a Chevrolet Corvette that he gave to Vickie Jolley (defendant). Kay set up bank accounts using fictitious business names and pretended to pay amounts the church owed those businesses. To buy the Firebird, Kay wrote a check on one of the fictitious business accounts to pay the dealership slightly more than the car’s purchase price. Four months later, he used a cashier’s check drawn on the same account to pay another dealership $3,000 toward the $5008.87 purchase price of the Corvette. Kay paid the remaining balance in cash a few days after withdrawing $2,700 cash from the same account. Jolley went with Kay to the dealership to buy the Corvette. After the purchases, Kay transferred the title to each car to Jolley without consideration. After discovering the embezzlement, the church sued Jolley seeking a constructive trust on the two cars. The district court granted judgment for the church and issued a decree imposing a constructive trust. Jolley appealed, arguing that a constructive trust could be imposed against only a fiduciary or confidant and that even if a constructive trust could be imposed against a third person, it could extend only to the amount of funds embezzled and traceable to the cars, not cash.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Crockett, C.J.)
Dissent (Henriod, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.