The Diocese of Rochester v. AB 100 Doe (In re the Diocese of Rochester)
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of New York
2022 WL 1638966 (2022)
- Written by Kelly Nielsen
Facts
The Diocese of Rochester (the diocese) (debtor) filed for a bankruptcy reorganization under Chapter 11. In the bankruptcy proceeding, the diocese negotiated an agreement with a large group of survivors of child sexual abuse (the abuse survivors) (creditors). Under this agreement, the abuse survivors voluntarily agreed to temporarily delay filing state-court civil actions against parishes, schools, and other Catholic institutions that were affiliated with the diocese (the Catholic corporations). The Catholic corporations were legally separate entities that were beyond the fiscal and operating control of the diocese. After three years of waiting and 11 extensions of the initial deadline, three abuse survivors had died, and the remaining abuse survivors refused to voluntarily delay any longer. The diocese filed a motion asking the bankruptcy court to either (1) apply the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) to stay the proposed state-court lawsuits against the nondebtor Catholic corporations or (2) use the court’s equitable powers under 11 U.S.C. § 105(a) to issue a preliminary injunction preventing those lawsuits until the diocese’s bankruptcy action was complete. The diocese argued that the state-court actions would harm its reorganization efforts because the actions could deplete insurance policies that also covered the diocese and could divert personnel from the reorganization efforts. The bankruptcy court considered the motion.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Warren, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.