The Friends of the Earth Case
European Court of Justice
[2011] EUECJ C-115/09
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Arnsberg District Administration (defendant) granted Trianel Kohlekraftwerk GmbH & Co. KG a permit to build a coal power station. The Nordrhein-Westfalen branch of Friends of the Earth (plaintiff) brought suit in German court seeking an invalidation of the permit based on the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention). Specifically, the Aarhus Convention prohibited national laws that prevented nongovernmental environmental organizations from bringing judicial actions seeking to invalidate permits for projects that would have significant environmental effects. The Aarhus Convention was approved by the European Union (EU), and EU law required the laws of each nation to align with the Aarhus Convention. The German court found that German environmental law protected the interests of the general public but not individuals. The court thus stated that Friends of the Earth did not have the ability to challenge the permit under German law. However, the court believed that this restriction may violate the Aarhus Convention. Accordingly, the court referred the question to the European Court of Justice.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.