The “Hartz IV” decision

BVerfG, 1 BvL 1/09 vom 9.2.2010, Absatz-Nr. (1-220) (2010)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

The “Hartz IV” decision

German Constitutional Court
BVerfG, 1 BvL 1/09 vom 9.2.2010, Absatz-Nr. (1-220) (2010)

  • Written by Nathan Herkamp, JD

Facts

German unemployment benefits were reformed by the Bundestag in 2009 by an act commonly known as Hartz IV. A family of three (plaintiffs) applied to receive unemployment benefits. The family was informed of the benefits that would be provided to them. The family challenged the benefits determined, arguing that a larger amount was necessary to maintain their human dignity. The unemployment benefits available consisted of benefits for housing and heating as well as a standard benefit, which was calculated based on the family members’ ages and capabilities and on other factors. The standard benefit was determined by a calculation created by the legislature that accounted for costs of living, expenditures necessary, and average consumer conduct. After the standard benefit was determined, certain deductions were applied to account for expenses that might not be related to subsistence living. After the family’s administrative challenge failed to change the benefit, the family began legal proceedings in the local social court. The social court dismissed the complaint, explaining that the standard benefit was an acceptable means of providing social welfare and respecting human dignity, as required by the Basic Law. After the family appealed to the Hesse Higher Social Court, the court suspended the proceedings to refer a general question to the Federal Constitutional Court. The Hesse Higher Social Court asked whether the Hartz IV unemployment-benefit reforms passed by the Bundestag violated the Basic Law, particularly articles 1.1 and 20.1.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership